Are you an educator?

Inclusive case studies matter because cases do more than help students practice analysis; they also shape how students understand entrepreneurship, who they recognize as legitimate entrepreneurs, and what kinds of ventures they believe are worth building. Case-based learning is a powerful pedagogical tool because it asks students to work through ambiguity, apply theory to real decisions, and engage with the complexity of practice (Garvin, 2007; Herreid & Schiller, 2013). In entrepreneurship education, this matters even more because students are not only learning skills; they are also exploring possible entrepreneurial identities and learning what entrepreneurship can look like (Béchard & Grégoire, 2005; Neck & Greene, 2011; Nabi et al., 2017). Yet research also shows that business and entrepreneurship cases are not neutral. They can reproduce narrow assumptions about leadership, innovation, growth, gender, race, and legitimacy, especially when the stories we teach repeatedly centre the same kinds of founders and the same kinds of success (Bridgman et al., 2016; Sharen & McGowan, 2019; Batchelder et al., 2025; Richard, Deal, & Mills, 2021).

This matters deeply in food, agriculture, and ocean economies, where entrepreneurship is tied to food security, climate resilience, ecological sustainability, community well-being, and regional economic futures (FAO, 2023; Krause et al., 2022). These sectors are full of innovation, but the stories and leadership of women, Indigenous peoples, racialized founders, small-scale operators, and community-based ventures remain underrepresented in many entrepreneurship classrooms. Research on women’s entrepreneurship in agrifood systems, ocean economies, and entrepreneurship policy shows that participation is shaped not only by individual opportunity, but also by the systems, narratives, policies, and ecosystems that define whose work is visible, legitimate, and supported (Dimick et al., 2025; Doolittle Llanos et al., 2025; Richard, 2025; Richard, Muldoon, & Lee, 2025).

Harvesting Impact responds to that gap by creating open, accessible, and equity-informed teaching materials that help students ask better questions about opportunity, power, sustainability, inclusion, and impact. These cases and podcasts are designed to widen the stories we teach and give students more ways to see entrepreneurship as a practice connected to communities, ecosystems, food systems, ocean economies, and social change.

Fill out the form to access our teaching notes!

References

Batchelder, S., Kuratko, D. F., Brush, T., & Karlin, M. (2025). The challenge of gender diversity for case-based instruction in entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 8(2), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/25151274241247827

Béchard, J.-P., & Grégoire, D. (2005). Entrepreneurship education research revisited: The case of higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2005.16132536

Bridgman, T., Cummings, S., & McLaughlin, C. (2016). Restating the case: How revisiting the development of the case method can help us think differently about the future of the business school. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 15(4), 724–741. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0291

Dimick, V., Richard, T., Muldoon, J., & Lee, Y. (2025). Women’s entrepreneurial identity: Insights from agriculturally intensive small island economy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 21, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-024-01021-0

Doolittle Llanos, S., Garteizgogeascoa, M., & Gonzales, I. E. (2025). A gendered blue economy? Critical perspectives through women’s participation in Peru. Ocean and Society, 2, Article 9167. https://doi.org/10.17645/oas.9167

FAO. (2023). The status of women in agrifood systems. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc5343en

Garvin, D. A. (2007). Teaching executives and teaching MBAs: Reflections on the case method. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(3), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2007.26361626

Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst13_042_05_62

Krause, G., Le Vay, L., Buck, B. H., Costa-Pierce, B. A., Dewhurst, T., Heasman, K. G., Nevejan, N., Nielsen, P., Nielsen, K. N., Park, K., Schupp, M. F., Thomas, J.-B., Troell, M., Webb, J., Wrange, A. L., Ziegler, F., & Strand, Å. (2022). Prospects of low trophic marine aquaculture contributing to food security in a net zero-carbon world. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, Article 875509. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.875509

Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026

Neck, H. M., & Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00314.x

Richard, T. (2025). A discourse of women entrepreneurship policy in Canada. Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 7(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/26437015.2025.2457609

Richard, T., Deal, N. M., & Mills, A. J. (2021). Damsels in distress: Discourses of entrepreneurship in management textbooks. Industry and Higher Education, 35(4), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222211019311

Richard, T., Muldoon, J., & Lee, Y. (2025). The confluence of gender and entrepreneurship: Moving research forward by embracing parallel research streams. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 35(3), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.53703/001c.143464

Sharen, C. M., & McGowan, R. A. (2019). Invisible or clichéd: How are women represented in business cases? Journal of Management Education, 43(2), 129–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562918812154